Before you aim that machine-gun (pardon the pun) at me, could we stop to consider for a minute what is "contemporary?" Do we absolutely have to break windows, shatter glass and scream, in order to produce "contemporary" art?

Consider a similar situation in music: half a century ago, lovers of contemporary music wouldn't have sat still for anything that wasn't within the twelve-tone scale. Now here we are in the 21stC and the 12-tone scale, while sometimes still heard, seems rather quaint. Nice, but dated. Harmonies -- good God, even the occasional major third -- are everywhere to be heard; and still the music is undeniably contemporary.

Notions of beauty do change, but could we do without the machine-guns?

Aurelia

-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to