This is a fascinating topic, Alice. I'm not an expert needlewoman, but part of the theory may hold water. Modern needlewomen have the help of technological advances, such as excellent lighting, magnification, and a variety of threads, and probably superior needles.
They also have the benefit of time, in that they're not trying to earn a living from their work. More lace meant more income (theoretically). The caveat to that is that quality counted in those days, and poor lace wasn't rewarded (certainly the case with bl, and some of the noted buyers in Bedfordshire, for eg.). Lacemakers today have the luxury of time to spend pursuing a hobby and precision in workmanship. The other part of the theory is what do you consider 'better'? The women of yore would most likely only make one type of lace (or even one pattern), so therefore they may be considered more skilled in making their stitches. They also worked with much finer threads, requiring more care. Also, to be considered, the quality of the designs worked. Just my 2 cents worth. And to kill the other bird with this one stone: There are lots of things I've always wanted, but I think I've always wanted to just go on a week long lacemaking binge - shopping and making. If I could have it all at a nice cosy little place with a drop dead gorgeous view of the mountains and snow falling, I think I'd be pretty happy. Maybe my MIL will let me try that one day at her house in the mountains. Hmmmm... Cheers, Helen, Aussie in Denver, eagerly awaiting results of the IOLI contest - To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
