I did not mean to insult the integrity of the little lacemaker. I just
want to note that as illustrious as the source of this interpretation
is, there are still other ways to use the same information. A devoted
housewife can also be (and, it was probably also true 350-400 years ago)
someone who was privately seductive and enjoyed her married life. I see
this when I look at the picture. It makes me happy.
Clay
On 9/17/2011 6:03 PM, Jean Eke wrote:
In the booklet, 'Highlights, The Wallace Collection' published by The
Trustees of the Wallace Collection, 2003
the painting is interpreted thus:
"Dutch paintings of the 17th century often had a moral. In this small picture, the
little lacemaker serves as an example of good behaviour for a Dutch housewife of the
time. The mussels lying at her feet are a symbol of her virtue as both stay in their
shell. Her discarded shoes suggest she cannot leave the house without them and so avoids
temptation. The broom beside her emphasises her spotless house. On her richly
embroidered cap is an emblem of doves and clasped hands that tell us she is a loving
wife. Lace-making was also a sign of the virtuous housewife, since it was a long,
laborious process allowing the maker little freedom from domesticity." !
I hope the Wallace Collection will forgive such a long quote but I felt I must
defend the little lacemaker and advertise a wonderful Art Gallery in London.
They also have Frans Hals, The Laughing Cavalier, with his wonderful
needlepoint cuffs and collar.
Jean Eke in Sussex , England, on a chilly , wet& windy late evening.
-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://community.webshots.com/user/arachne2003
-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://community.webshots.com/user/arachne2003
