It appears that it was sometimes the case that there were  books that 
combined needle lace or embroidery patterns with calligraphy. I know  that some 
scholars have made the point that the era coincides with rising female  
literacy. 
 
I think the point has also been made that after female  literacy really 
took hold, home needlework seemed to decline in quality. 
 
Is this book a reprint or is it supposed to be an original  from the 1600s? 
There were an incredible number of 16th and 17th century pattern  books 
reprinted from the 1870s to the early 20th century. The only date I saw  was 
1604 which was in the calligraphy of the book.
 
I will also point out something that others may have missed.  The donor of 
the book is Magdalena Nuttal. Magdalena Nuttal donated a very large  
collection of lace to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, much of it small samples  
that I think she must have obtained during travels in Europe. If one were  to 
look at the MMA collection on line, all the lace whose accession numbers  
start with 08.180. are her donation. The significance of the 08. in the  
accession number is that she donated all these pieces in 1908.  Indeed  the 
book 
says it was bought in Paris, in 1900 on a little slip of paper at the  end of 
the scan. I think that Magdalena Nuttal must have thought it was lace  
related. 
 
Devon
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/11/2011 1:25:44 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

Interesting about the alphabet. Italian still does not use 'j'  except
in imported words.
The collection seems to be an exercise book  for writing, including the
ornamentation around the script. Was it intended  as a lace book as
such?
I haven't studied it thoroughly and the only  date I found at first
glance looks to be added long after these pages were  penned (so
beautifully).

Yes, thanks so much to Tess.

On  10/11/11, Agnes Boddington <[email protected]> wrote:
>  Thanks again, Tess, for all your hard work.
> What I found interesting  as a linguist, was the alphabet on page 81 - no 
J -
> U - W yet.
>  In those days  functioned as J, and V as U/V/W.

-- 
Bev in  Shirley BC, near Sooke on beautiful Vancouver Island, west
coast of  Canada

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]  containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write  to
[email protected]. Photo  site:
http://community.webshots.com/user/arachne2003

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://community.webshots.com/user/arachne2003

Reply via email to