I once saw quite a fascinating slide show presented by Lia  Baumeister. She 
had discovered that the Netherlands had an index of every  painting in the 
country and she had isolated all the lacemaker ones. She showed  picture 
after picture of very nice interiors, women in fur pieces, and attended  by 
servants, making bobbin lace. Her thesis was that it was practiced by middle  
to upper income people, possibly for purposes of enjoyment. It was quite  
convincing. 
 
I have always thought that bobbin lace making might have been  among one of 
the skills that a young woman of good family may have  been trained in to 
prepare her for marriage in that era. From time to time I see  things in 
texts that suggest that. Virtuous women, domesticity and  textile production 
are 
often associated, even when it doesn't make economic  sense.  Even my 
mother bought a sewing machine when she got married and  attempted to make her 
own curtains. Ladies often do embroidery ostensibly for  household use, but 
primarily for enjoyment.
 
I have always identified with the Nicolaes Maes painting at  the 
Metropolitan Museum of Art.
_http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/110001376_ 
(http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/110001376) 
 
The description reads, "Maes painted a number of domestic scenes such as  
this one between 1655 and 1660. The woman's quiet absorption in her work may  
have been intended as an example of wifely virtue, a subject belabored by 
Dutch  authors such as Jacob ("Father") Cats."
 
Whether this picture reflects wifely virtue, or whether it depicts mom  
absorbed in her lacemaking while the baby has thrown its cup and rattle on the  
floor in a futile attempt to get mom's attention is up to the viewer to 
decide.  I think it is the latter. Probably my daughter would agree.
But then again, oil paintings are not photographs. Sometimes  the artist is 
trying to make a picture of a woman using her hands. Sometimes the  artist 
wants to paint rich fabrics and beautiful interiors. After all, you have  to 
sell these things to people for decorative purposes. There is an oil 
painting  by the American Impressionist  Robert Blum, in the Cincinnati Museum  
of 
an entirely different period, from the late 19th century, showing a group 
of  well dressed and beautiful young women making bobbin lace in what appears 
to be  a Palazzo in Venice. As my superior at the museum has written about 
this  painting, we have spent a lot of time discussing whether it was the 
case that  young heiresses ever took lace lessons in Venice, or whether Blum 
wanted to  paint young women in nice clothing using their hands in a 
beautiful sunlit  interior. Although my superior leans toward this theory, I 
nonetheless live in  hope that some day I will hear of young heiresses making 
lace 
in Venice. Lady  Evelyn seems to have had some kind of lace instruction in 
Venice, although I am  told that she had such fragile emotional health that a 
group class would  probably have been impossible. Sigh.
 
How fascinating that Vermeer's Lacemaker was owned by  Napoleon III, whose 
wife Eugenie was one of the biggest consumers of handmade  lace of the 
mid-19th century.
 
On the subject of fictional works that include lacemaking, I  am afraid 
that my faith that authors thoroughly research every aspect of a  fictional 
work has been badly shaken by the fact that authors often contact me  for 
information. The way this goes is that they have already constructed an  
elaborate plot which involves a preposterous account of lacemaking. One of them 
 
that I can think of involved a concept of hand lace making that reflected the  
idea that lacemaking doesn't take much time and that a single individual  
could be turning out veils at an almost industrial rate. They are  just doing 
a little fact checking, to assure themselves that the facts  they have made 
up are correct. When I attempt to explain why it is totally  at odds with 
anything that could have happened historically, they get a little  frantic 
because they don't want to rewrite the book. They have already had  enough 
trouble making the characters and plot work out without wanting to go  back and 
study lace history extensively to illuminate what they thought was a  
peripheral detail. So, I would say that almost anyone on this list probably  
knows 
more about lace than any writer of fiction. 
 
Devon

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://community.webshots.com/user/arachne2003

Reply via email to