I'd agree with both, and add that in comparison to needlelace there's less preparationÂ… no need to lay out foundation threads, etc. You just pick up the hook and go. It's also easier to correct mistakes.
Katrina Worley [email protected] -- History: special people in special places at special times Anthropology: everyone else the rest of the time. K.Worley, 1997 On Aug 24, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Beth McCasland <[email protected]> wrote: > I'll take a stab, two actually - > 1. you only need a ball of thread and a crochet hook > 2. it's faster. Having done filet/lacis, bobbin lace, and needlelace - > seems to me that crochet is faster. I can make a reticella like medallion > in an evening, where doing the same thing in actual reticella takes me days. > OK, theory #3 - more portable. At least for lacis or bobbin lace. You > could argue one way or the other over needlelace. > > Beth McCasland > Seattle, Washington, USA > where it's still summer, but there's a taste of fall on the air > > - > To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line: > unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to > [email protected]. Photo site: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/ - To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line: unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to [email protected]. Photo site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/
