Dear Catherine,
 
The May/June issue of PieceWork magazine has been delivered in  America.  I 
was surprised to see an article "Victoria's Passion - Queen  Victoria's 
Unremitting Love of All Things Lace".  There were things I had  never known.  
Christopher John Brooke Phillips, the author (born in  England, now in 
Spain), has used records that most English lace experts have  never shared in 
their books.  
 
It says the Spitalfields silk dress was designed by Mary Bellans (the  
greatly-respected English historian, Kay Staniland, spells this Bettans -  and 
calls her a dressmaker) and the lace was designed by William Dyce,  Fellow of 
the Royal Society of Edinburgh, a member of the Royal Society of Arts  and 
the Royal Academy of Arts, and head of the Government School of Design  
(later the Royal College of Art, London).
 
He says it was to have been supplied from Brussels, but Victoria specified  
that it be manufactured in Great Britain and that it be Honiton lace.  He  
goes on to say it was manufactured in several villages within a 40-mile 
radius  of Honiton.  
 
It says the veil, 54 inches square, and the flounce 144 inches by 27  
inches, were made in Branscombe and Beer, engaging 200 lace makers from March 
to  
November 1839.  The Queen's representative, Miss Bidney, supervised and  
ensured timely completion, after which the designs were destroyed.  He  claims 
today the cost of the lace would exceed $1-million American  dollars.  He 
also says the Queen instructed that after death she be  interred with her 
wedding veil draped around her face.
 
So, here you have a most recent account.  It does not include a  
Bibliography.  People like Santina Levey, Kay Staniland and Elsie  Luxton have 
written 
informed books about Queen Victoria's lace.
 
In "Queen Victoria's Wedding Dress and Lace" by Staniland/Levey, 32 pages  
extracted from another publication "Costume" dated 1983, they give the  
depth of the flounce as 25 1/2 inches.  They write about 4 pieces of lace  
still 
on the dress -- the flounce, bertha collar, and 2 sleeve flounces.   These 
lace experts also say 200 lacemakers from March to November, but only  at 
Beers.  Their text quoted a newspaper of the time that "Her Majesty,  with 
regard to whose dress so much and so many contradictions have taken place,  was 
attired plainly, and with simple magnificence, in white satin, trimmed with 
 most splendid lace....round her head her Majesty wore a wreath of orange  
blossoms; but, contrary to all expectation, and in opposition to all 
prediction,  neither veil nor scarf was permitted to interfere with the free 
sight 
of her  Majesty's head, face, and neck".
 
It was these two lace experts who first uncovered the name of the  wedding 
lace designer, William Dyce,  while writing this  booklet.  They found it in 
1852 correspondence between Dyce and Sir  Henry Cole (our old friend, the 
first director of the V&A  Museum).     
 
A very large group painting, "The Marriage of Queen Victoria, 10 February  
1840" by Sir George Hayter, a clear view of the Queen's face.  There  
appears to be a veil attached at the back of her head.  You can G**gle  the 
artist's name to see it.
 
A 1847 painting by Winterhalter, shows the Queen, and she wrote about the  
sitting.  ...."I wearing my dear wedding veil",  It is attached at the  very 
back of her head, and there is a wreath of orange blossoms arranged like a  
crown - the same as at her wedding 7 years before.
 
I favor the 1997 Museum of London book "In Royal Fashion - the Clothes  of 
Princess Charlotte of Wales and Queen Victoria 1796-1901", by Kay  
Staniland.  It has many photographs of actual clothing and the best-known  
portraits.
 
There is also a 1988 book of good research, by Elsie Luxton and Yusai  
Fukuyama "Royal Honiton Lace".  Luxton was the well-known lace  expert with at 
least 6 Honiton books to her credit.
 
I have seen these Royal laces more than once, and written about  them to 
Arachne several times.  Newbies may be able to find those  other memos in 
Arachne archives.  The last time I saw the gown at  Kensington Palace, the 
flounce had been removed - too fragile to continue to be  exhibited.   They had 
put some disgusting net (modern scratchy kind)  on the mannequin's head, 
which was confusing to non-lace people trying to  relate to the concept of a 
Queen and Empress!  
 
Jeri Ames in Maine USA
Lace and Embroidery Resource Center

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to