Lorelei asked about the dresses in the Fashion and Virtue exhibit.
 
The dresses date from the early 20th century. They belonged to the  
socialite Rita de Acosta Lydig. She had a strong fondness for lace and was 
known  
for wearing antique pieces. In fact, her shoe collection, owned by the  
Metropolitan Museum, has a lot of very genuine looking antique lace on the  
shoes! The dresses were produced, it is thought by Callot Souers, a French  
dressmaking enterprise run by sisters, also known for their fondness for lace.  
They were descended from lacemakers. It is unclear whether some of these 
clothes  made for Lydig incorporated pieces from her antique lace collection, 
or 
whether  Callot Souers used antique lace that they sourced, or whether they 
used lace  newly made in the many revival lace industries that existed in 
the early 20th  century. 
When my colleague and I organized the Gems of European Lace exhibit several 
 years ago, we had initially been working with the idea of putting out the  
study cards that are on the one wall of this exhibit, and then adding a few 
 things. We had selected the dress for this exhibit because it incorporated 
the  gridded patterns of the pattern books. I liked it because it showed 
how the lace  collectors of the early 20th century were really hard core, even 
choosing to  wear a lace that was historic and dramatic, but which flew in 
the face of  associations of femininity, romance, diaphanousness, etc. 
Having gone through  the difficult permissioning process, we kept the dress in 
our exhibit,  even after the entire premise of the exhibit changed. For one 
thing, people  seemed to really like that dress. 
On the subject of whether the dress is actually made of antique lace,  I 
have never really decided. The back of the dress actually has a  different 
piece of lace, similar, but not as interesting a design put into it.  So does 
this mean it was an antique piece that didn't fully fit the requirements  for 
the dress pattern? Alternatively, it is right where the wearer would be  
sitting. Maybe the lace was damaged when Rita sat on something and the  dress 
had to be repaired? In trying to figure this out, we did come  across some 
evidence that this kind of lace was being made in the 20th  century in 
Sardinia. So that argues for a 20th century origin.
The area of the exhibit with those dresses is sort of oriented  toward 
concepts of the use of the designs from the pattern books in fashion  and in 
folk costume. In fact, the designer Todd Oldham has a dress in the  exhibit. He 
is engaging in a "conversation" this Friday evening with  the curator in 
the Lehman wing where the exhibit is. My interest in the  exhibit is more 
related to historical textiles, than to fashion, but,  I am planning to attend. 
Devon

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to