Dear Leonard,
The crest is that of Princess Alice. The corners are not designed as such. The
lace was made as a strip and the corners are examples of masterly joining as
in “lassen”.
Yes, terminology is a mish mash. Is Milanese a style?
One hint that I have gotten in another correspondence on this point is that in
the late 19th century any lace with a gimp around the motif was called
Mechlin. I don’t exactly know what to do about this, because I am not sure
that in the early 21st century anyone would consider a lace with a five hole
ground to be Mechlin. It just appears to be puzzling.
As you say, someone looking for a late 19th early 20th century handkerchief
could probably find it in our data base using all the other fields. But, would
it be misleading if they then read that it was Mechlin? What would be better?
Flanders?
Devon


Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Leonard Bazar
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 12:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: Turnout lace, Met Handkerchief

Dear Devon and Lorelei

As far as I can see in Van speldengrond tot Turnhoutse kant, 2009, by Nora
Andries, Lieve Vroom and others, five-hole ground was not used, assuming that
is cane-ground or rose ground - the Met's photo pixillates on my computer if I
zoom, so I can't see the ground. It is worked on a 45 degree angle, unlike the
standard kat stitch ground of Turnhout. The other characteristic of Turnhout
lace is that the worker can leave the cloth, go round a pin, and return as a
passive, unlike other Flemish laces with other grounds, and indeed unlike
Bucks when done with a kat stitch ground. It would be interesting to know what
the worker of the handkerchief did, though of course that may not help locate
his or her workplace or training in one place or another.

I think this is the standard problem of using a place name to classify a lace,
and trying to determine where it was made - not always the same thing, as
place names are notoriously attributed just for convenience or worse. Bucks
and Beds in the nineteenth century were both made in Northamptonshire,
Bedfordshire and Buckinghamshire of course, and Mr Armstrong's catalogue of
about 1911 describes what we would call Beds as 'Bucks. Cluny Lace'. As he was
based in Olney, his workers could have been in any of the three counties. East
Devon lace, no doubt sold to wholesalers in London as Honiton lace as that's
where the coach transporting it came from, and where it could well have been
made, would probably be called Brussels by the retailer, if he thought it
would get a higher price...

I think it's fairly clear from our inability to find a place name to describe
it that there isn't one - even if you did determine where it was made,
indexing it under that place isn't going to help one of us track the piece
down if we are looking for lace using those techniques in that style. I
suspect the only practical solution is to hope that the Met has a searchable
index, which could include a short description with the relevant key words in
it.

However, you could possibly attack it from the other angle. It is clearly a
high-quality piece, made to fit a handkerchief with different well-designed
corners, and made of linen not cotton. You know the previous owner, and it is
possible that the Met's note of provenance as French could be based on more
than a guess - if the Duchess is known to have bought it, or acquired it as a
present from Princess Alice, there may be a record. I can't make out if the
crest includes initials, but there is a coronet, so it presumably was
specially commissioned. Indeed, for once this mystery could cast some light,
and give at least one place where this sort of lace was made!

Kind regards


Leonard



Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 17:06:53 -0600
From: "Lorelei Halley" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [lace] Turnhout lace

Devon
Interesting piece. The photo doesn't allow me to see any construction
details. But, as to your question, I haven't a clue. I wish we knew more
about the detailed history of revival era laces (c. 1900). Turnhout, as I
understand it, had a Paris ground. Possibly Michel Bouvot may have something
to add. Contact through laceioli.
Lorelei

- -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 12:20 PM
To: 'Arachne reply' <[email protected]>
Subject: [lace] Turnhout lace

Was Turnhout lace ever made with a five hole mesh for the background? We are
wondering if this is Turnhout?

http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/228920?sortBy=Relevance&f
t
=63.196.11&amp;offset=0&amp;rpp=20&amp;pos=1

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type image/png which had a name of 
CDB9725EF865423ABD3D2FFFD0D7B2B9.png]

-
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [email protected]. For help, write to
[email protected]. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to