Thanks Brenda--it would have been easier if I had started with your pattern 
because you specified the thread!  Unfortunately, I only have time for a small 
project & this seemed like one I could ferret out.  What I do like--& I had not 
thought of it--is altering the ground.  Let's say Torchon ground for tight 
spots & Dieppe or Brussels for more open areas.  Hmmm, this really adds a new 
wrinkle & it's not a twipper!  Thanks for adjusting my thinking cap.  
Sincerely, Susan Hottle USA 

Sent from my iPad

> On Aug 14, 2017, at 3:06 PM, Brenda Paternoster <paternos...@appleshack.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> The logarithmic lace which I did a while ago was a combination of theory and 
> winging it when it came to choosing the thread.  Theory wise go for the 
> mid-range, but err towards thicker rather than finer; go for the thickest 
> that can be squeezed into the closest parts without it wrinkling or 
> ‘twippering’.  

> Also consider that loosely spun threads such as machine embroidery, perle and 
> a lot of spun silk will squash down better than tightly spun thread, and they 
> will also relax and spread out in the places where the pins are furthest 
> apart.  Those threads though will make a soft lace.  Depending on the 
> pattern, you might be able to introduce extra twists or a heavier ground in 
> the most open areas.

-
To unsubscribe send email to majord...@arachne.com containing the line:
unsubscribe lace y...@address.here. For help, write to
arachne.modera...@gmail.com. Photo site:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lacemaker/sets/

Reply via email to