Thanks for your analysis but I'm using latest firefox on fedora 19 linux, with the same results. Is there a special config that i need to set in my browser? Regards
2015-12-19 13:00 GMT+01:00 <[email protected]>: > Send Lam-public mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Lam-public digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Bug in GroupOfNames management via tree-view (Francesco Tombolini) > 2. Re: Bug in GroupOfNames management via tree-view (Roland Gruber) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 16:22:37 +0100 > From: Francesco Tombolini <[email protected]> > Subject: [Lam-public] Bug in GroupOfNames management via tree-view > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > < > camr1c8ivvybq7a6qpbg2ht3p-_hcss8fv6tydpwkxyqe_ik...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi Roland, > I find that the groupOfNames management via tree-view in lam could lead to > data loss. > If the groupOfNames is bigger than 1k entries and I try to change the owner > of the group, editing it from that view, when I save the changes, datas > over the fixed amount will be removed by default. > Could you check this please? > Best regards. > > If you want, i can send you some screenshots of the issue. > > > > -- > > Francesco Tombolini <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Key fingerprint = A23A9A47http://www.adamantio.net > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:20:54 +0100 > From: Roland Gruber <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Lam-public] Bug in GroupOfNames management via tree-view > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" > > Ciao Francesco, > > On 18.12.2015 16:22, Francesco Tombolini wrote: > > I find that the groupOfNames management via tree-view in lam could lead > to > > data loss. > > If the groupOfNames is bigger than 1k entries and I try to change the > owner > > of the group, editing it from that view, when I save the changes, datas > > over the fixed amount will be removed by default. > > this is a browser issue. E.g. Internet Explorer allows not more than > 1000 input fields. Any additional ones are silently ignored. > > So for such large groups please do not use the tree view. > > > -- > > Best regards > > Roland > > > LDAP Account Manager > http://www.ldap-account-manager.org/ > > Want more? Get LDAP Account Manager Pro! > https://www.ldap-account-manager.org/lamcms/lamPro > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 648 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > > ------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Lam-public mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public > > > End of Lam-public Digest, Vol 109, Issue 8 > ****************************************** > -- Francesco Tombolini <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> Key fingerprint = A23A9A47http://www.adamantio.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Lam-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public
