Roland, Thanks for the explanation and that makes sense!
Please remove my feature request. Jose ________________________________ From: Roland Gruber <p...@rolandgruber.de> Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2021 3:03 PM To: lam-public@lists.sourceforge.net <lam-public@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [Lam-public] Feature Request; SQLite DB support Hi Jose, Am 07.07.21 um 15:45 schrieb Gomez-Rubio, J L. via Lam-public: > With the release of LAM 7.6 supporting MySQL, any chance to support > SQLite DB in a future version of LAM? there seems to be no real benefit of supporting SQLite as it also operates on the local file system. The big benefit of MySQL is that the config data can be on a remote DB. This allows e.g. stateless installations of LAM servers. Do I miss anything? Best regards Roland -- LDAP Account Manager https://www.ldap-account-manager.org/ _______________________________________________ Lam-public mailing list Lam-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public
_______________________________________________ Lam-public mailing list Lam-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public
