On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 07:35:35 +0200, Roland Gruber <p...@rolandgruber.de> wrote: >posixGroup and groupOfNames are structural object classes. This means >you can only have one of them per entry. For memberOf you will need to >create additional groupOfNames entries.
Ack. Are these to be duplicated records, so I have for each group a posixGroup and a groupOfNames group with effectively the same data? >LAM has a sync button when you edit the Unix groups of a user to help a >bit. Hmm...this seems relevant https://www.ldap-account-manager.org/static/doc/manual/ch04s03.html#rfc2307bisPosixGroup When you say "sync", how does this help if all of my groups are in posixGroup? Reading this section: This will automatically set the group memberships of the Unix part to the same members as set on group of names tab. Can LAM pro copy all the posixGroup entries to groupOfNames entries in any way? > But you need to create both types of groups first. This seems less than ideal ... the implication I am receiving is that we have to maintain two different LDAP records for each group. Is it possible to get dynlist to traverse the posixGroup entries and come up with memberOf values? -- Dave Hayes - Computer and Internet Consultant - LA CA, USA >> *Opinions expressed above are entirely my own* << It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence which could support this. _______________________________________________ Lam-public mailing list Lam-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lam-public
