I support both these proposals and would remind everyone that English
Wikisource also hosts Old English texts, so there is no need for a
separate ang-wikisource.
Antony
On 07.10.2014 02:41, MF-Warburg wrote:
Hi all,
we have several closure proposals which should be decided... Here are
the first two:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Old_English_Wikibooks_2
Reasons are outlined on the page; the majority of users agrees.
To summarize:
- Wikibooks is for textbooks and manuals, but nobody is writing them
in this extinct language nor is there much reason why someone would
want to /read/ them.
Wikisource is the project that should exist for this language.
In fact, some pages on the wiki do belong to Wikisource, and should be
moved there. This is also consistent with Langcom's previous decisions
that ancient languages should above all have Wikisource, but the other
projects are not all suitable for them.
=> I propose: Close, move content to Incubator, or, where appropriate,
to Wikisoure.
----
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Interlingue_Wikibooks
The wiki is a case of "absence of content since its creation". Of the
few page, some should even be moved to Wiktionary (as some people
noted in the discussion).
=> I propose: Close, move content to Incubator, or, where appropriate,
to Wiktionary.
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
--
Dr. Antony Green
Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31, WE 1703
10369 Berlin, Germany
Phone: +49 (0)30 34 50 98 97
Mobile: +49 (0)163 370 08 27
E-mail: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
