We had a discussion about the eligibility in March, there was no conclusion, but so far nobody brought up problems either... though I'm still a bit wary because we already had a fair share of problems with such languages which are macrolanguages with Southern, Eastern, Northern etc. subdivisions. But at least there is an ISO 639-3 code.
The most-used msgs are complete. Activity is sustained by at least 3 editors since February (so 3 months now at the end of April), which is ok (though the most active contributor in this month is a bot). I find Gerard's question interesting - anyone can look at https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex/wp/bgn to find out - I will try to do this tomorrow and inform you all. 2015-04-22 20:30 GMT+02:00 Amir E. Aharoni <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > I received a few requests to check the status of Western Balochi incubator > (bgn). > > The code bgn is legit, the translation of most-used messages is complete, > and the activity in the incubator is reasonable. A lot of pages are > written; many are just one or two lines long, but I don't think that I mind. > > Do we want to verify that it's the right language? > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > “We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
