Please reformulate. I understood nothing.
Am 24.06.2015 17:40 schrieb "Gerard Meijssen" <[email protected]>:

> Hoi,
> For Konkani we know that a language organisation is willing to work hard
> on content, localisation etc. I asked at the time to waive the restriction
> on their word. The possible sanction to remove all the content in a set
> period of time to have all requirements implemented was not enough for some.
>
> Consequently we deadlocked. Nothing happened as a result.
> Thanks.
>       GerardM
>
> On 24 June 2015 at 09:25, Asaf Bartov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi, folks.
>>
>> I'm drawing your attention to this request:
>>
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Goan_Konkani#Request_to_the_community_and_to_LangCom_to_include_the_Latin_script_articles
>>
>> It seems to me it is a matter for this committee and for the existing
>> community of Devanagari Konkani (apparently partially overlapping with the
>> Latin Konkani contributor base!) to determine.  I.e. whether Latin articles
>> should live in gom.wikipedia.org alongside Devanagari or not, and if
>> not, whether a separate Latin Konkani Wikipedia is warranted, or whether a
>> script-transliteration gadget like the Serbian one is possible.
>>
>>    A.
>> --
>>     Asaf Bartov
>>     Wikimedia Foundation <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org>
>>
>> Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
>> sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
>> https://donate.wikimedia.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to