Hoi,
It is exactly one of the competences of the Language committee to allow for
new projects. With the stagnant affairs of new secondary projects, I am of
the opinion that we may rethink our policy. Currently a large part of all
the messages need to be translated. I doubt that it can be seriously
expected to happen for nap.wikisource. At the same time I would personally
welcome it for the value that it brings.
Thanks,
     GerarddM

On 6 August 2015 at 11:18, Oliver Stegen <[email protected]> wrote:

> As far as I know, the acceptance of an additional wiki-product is not
> within LangCom's activities; only first-ever wiki-products in a new
> language are. As Neapolitan has a wikipedia already, wikisource should be
> granted automatically if all requirements are fulfilled. No discussion and
> explicit approval by LangCom should be needed.
>
> Best wishes,
> Oliver Stegen
>
>
> On 06-Aug-15 12:18 AM, C. Russo wrote:
>
> I want to bring to the attention of the Langcom that there is an application
> for a neapolitan wikisource
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Neapolitan>
> pending evaluation since 2011.
>
> The status of the neapolitan wikisource project is as follows:
> - More than 2500 proofread pages
> - Three or more contributors during the last 8 months
> - Two or more contributors working intensively during more than 1 year
> - Core localisation complete, proofread complete, extensions at 30% and
> growing
> - Third biggest language in mul.wikisource by number of pages and growing
> - First language in mul.wikisource with a request on hold
> - Iso code and long-term running wikipedia
>
> We need the project to be activated:
> - We'll provide better tools within our own language domain
> - We'll provide better access to our native speakers and literates
> - It is a minority language and time passes while the speaking population
> gets older (and the contributors too)
> - We'll provide easy access to the humanity to the public domain in our
> language. This is now simply getting diluted into mul.wikisource,
> it.wikisource or en.wikisource, just as our books and songs are diluted and
> lost into the libraries of all over the world.
>
> If approved and opened tomorrow it would be already more active and big
> than many other open wikisources.
>
> Thanks for the attention,
> C.R.
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Neapolitan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to