Very good. 2017-01-23 21:49 GMT+01:00 Milos Rancic <[email protected]>:
> Initially, before I read the content of the page, I've been thinking > to put this as a proposal. However, not just that there are no > reasonable linguistic basis, but I see the proposal [1] as edgy in the > sense of trolling. > > My comment with rejection is: > > According to the article Reforms of Portuguese orthography [2], > Portuguese and Brazilian philologists and institutions support unified > language. Consequently, the basis for the request doesn't exist. > > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_ > languages/Wikipedia_European_Portuguese_3 > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reforms_of_Portuguese_orthography > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
