Hoi,
There is little point at this time in a dictionary. With work going on for
a Wikidatification of Wiktionary it is a real bad investment. There is much
more to be gained by having books digitised.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 27 January 2017 at 16:51, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Gerard Meijssen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What is the purpose of answering that question when it makes no
> difference
> > in the way we work. Why would we consider it, what is the point. Asking
> for
> > academic reasons?
>
> Asaf, I agree with Gerard's position in relation to the purpose of the
> question/answer.
>
> May you clarify which practical implications you want to achieve with
> this question?
>
> If it's about the set of suggestions for people trying to preserve
> their languages, I suggest a very cautious approach just after they
> get what they want. Yes, it seems more rational to push them to make a
> good bilingual dictionary, but we have to be careful not to alienate
> them.
>
> If you had in your mind something else, please let us know.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
