Hoi,
The problem with Arabic languages is that in the past they were denied by
the board.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 29 January 2017 at 05:56, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just to say that I will wait for at least 8 days till the conclusion
> of the requests. Also, in relation to the MF-Warburg's comment about
> being late: as long as we haven't concluded the case publicly, it's
> open for discussion.
>
> In this case, I've put the request on hold.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Milos Rancic <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I suggest marking the requiest for Wikipedia in Bahraini Arabic [1] on
> hold.
> >
> > Although it could be valid per se, there is a negative attitude
> > towards the language itself among the native speakers [2].
> >
> > So, while the request could be valid in a distant future, it is
> > presently invalid and we should wait till the population get positive
> > attitude towards their native language, if they get it ever.
> >
> > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_
> languages/Wikipedia_Bahrani_Arabic
> > [2] https://www.ethnologue.com/language/abv
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
