Klingon has a ridiculously limited vocabulary. LFN is as interesting and useful as Esperanto, and has a large and preactical vocabulary. I favour inclusiveness. It costs us little.
> On 31 Jan 2017, at 17:48, Oliver Stegen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please note that SIL accepted a change request (submitted by the inventor of > this language, cf. http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/cr_files/2007-144.pdf) but > Ethnologue did not include lfn in their editions ever. So? That’s Ethnologue’s business. > Given that LFN has a wiki on Wikia (cf. http://lfn.wikia.com/wiki/Paje_xef), > I don't see why we should accept it as a Wikimedia project. Let it go the way > of Klingon ... _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
