I agree, but may you give us your opinion in relation to the fact that Dogri has been split in Ethnologue [1] into "Dogri proper" [2] and Kangri [3]?
I think we should go with the "dgo" code, unless there is a strong reason to keep it under the "macrolanguage" code. (It is also quite possible that SIL/Ethnologue didn't have the best clue when approving the codes.) BTW, that's why I've omitted Dogri during the first pass. [1] https://www.ethnologue.com/language/doi [2] https://www.ethnologue.com/language/dgo [3] https://www.ethnologue.com/language/xnr On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Satdeep Gill <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > The first Indic language request I saw today was a request for Wikipedia > Dorgi.[1] > > Dogri is one of the 22 scheduled languages of India.[2] The Wikipedia > article mentions that Dogri is written in both Devanagari and Perso-Arabic > scripts. I personally have known Dogri to be written in Devanagari and > certain books published by the Government of India have also used Devanagari > script.[3] > > The person who proposed the project has also used Devanagari script while > writing the language name in the language. > > Hence, I suggest marking this proposal eligible for a Dogri Wikipedia in > Devanagari Language. > > [1] > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Dogri > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogri_language > [3] http://english.bharatavani.in/book/dogri-dogri-dictionary-part-1/ > > -- > Regards > Satdeep Gill > +91-9465155746 > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
