Hoi,
I am quite happy when someone argue their case. I will certainly listen. In
the past there were Americans who said to support languages from Papua New
Guinea. Their arguments is why we ask for native speakers. The good thing
of this policy is that we can do differently when the situation fits a need.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 31 January 2017 at 17:46, gfb hjjhjh <[email protected]> wrote:
> but as mentioned before, a language under revitalization effort mught have
> hundred of thousands L2 speakers with hundreds of them willing to work on
> the Wikipedia but it is still possible for none of them to be native.
>
> 2017年1月30日 17:13 於 "Milos Rancic" <[email protected]> 寫道：
>
>> On Jan 30, 2017 4:20 AM, "gfb hjjhjh" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> As discussed before, it would take a few decades before a language under
>> revitalizing effort to gain a native speaker.
>>
>> The context of "having native speakers" is not existential, but having
>> them working on particular project.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
