On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 7:09 PM, gfb hjjhjh <[email protected]> wrote:
> What being described within the request does exist although i am doubtful
> about does that count as a language of its own. The wording there mean it is
> an actual variants of Cantonese spoken in part of SE Asia, which to my
> knowledge do have numerous lexicon difference from Cantonese being spoken in
> rest of the world with many words being absorbed from other languages in the
> region. And there are also different trend in pronunciation shift. But
> overall speaking they're still very intelligible to the Cantonese speaker
> from Guangzhou and Hong Kong, much more than some other Cantonese dialect.
> Also, attempted to search the chinese name of the proposed language yield no
> relevant result so the name is probably invented by the one who wrote the
> proposal.

Thank you for the insights! (In related note, there are a couple of
Chinese-related requests and I would like to hear your input about
them. Will raise them during the next days.)

_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to