I've marked this as rejected.

2017-03-02 11:43 GMT+01:00 Milos Rancic <[email protected]>:

> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Oliver Stegen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > As a linguist I cannot support the argument that "it is only a dialect",
> as
> > the continuum between language and dialect is often arbitrary and
> political.
> > However, based on the argument that Sichuanese Mandarin does not have an
> ISO
> > code, I support the rejection of this request. Should they succeed in
> > getting an ISO code for their language (for which there seems to be good
> > reason if I understood the linguistic arguments correctly), then the
> request
> > can be reopened or renewed.
>
> While I agree with rejection in this case, I would add here one
> (generic) set of arguments why following ISO 639-3 strictly is not
> appropriate for Wikimedia (and the other one in relation to
> Prekmurian).
>
> Wikipedia is not just about a language, but about a *written*
> language. For example, written phonetically, English varieties could
> be even more different than Eastern Scandinavian languages (including
> Norwegian Bokmal) or East Slavic languages. However, they've been
> written in a couple of very similar orthographies and there is no
> reason to create the set of Wikimedia projects in Texan English.
>
> In the Chinese case, it goes even further: As long as the syntax is
> more or less the same and the same characters are used to designate
> the same concepts, creating a project in a Chinese variety (not just
> Mandarin) would be redundant. In other words, any request for
> Wikimedia projects in Chinese written in Han should convince us that
> their variety is distinctive enough to have a separate project, no
> matter of having an ISO 639-3 code.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to