Hi Antony, The reason we should not reject this proposal is the same reason we have two Wikipedias for Punjabi.
There is no major linguistic difference but complete linguistic coversion is not possible. Also, we will have to consider one script superior to other. Regards Satdeep Gill Strategy Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation Co-founder, Punjabi Wikimedians Treasurer, Affiliations Committee Member, Language Committee > On 03-Apr-2017, at 10:30 PM, Antony Green <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is a request for Sindi in Devanagari > [meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Sindhi]. As far > as anyone can tell, there is no linguistic difference between this and > Arabic-script Sindhi, which already has a Wikipedia at sd.wikipedia.org. > A user has pointed out > [meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Sindhi&diff=16501764&oldid=16478916] > that online conversion between the two scripts should be possible (neither > script uses capital letters), so is there any reason we shouldn't just reject > this proposal? > > Regards, > Antony > -- > Dr. Antony Green > Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 > WE 1703 > 10369 Berlin, Germany > E-Mail: [email protected] > Mobile: +49-176-82295920 > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
