We should consult, but it’s possible to ask the requester what he or she thinks about the naming.
> On 14 May 2017, at 20:33, Antony Green <[email protected]> wrote: > > A request has been made for Wikipedia in Sheshi Pang > [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Sheshi_Pang], > a Sino-Tibetan language of Nepal. However, ISO calls the language Sheshi > Kham [http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=kip]; the Wikipedia > article groups it together with three other languages as the Kham language > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kham_language]. Ethnologue estimates 20,000 > native speakers. > > Is there any reason not to mark this eligible? > > Should we use the requester's name Sheshi Pang or ISO's name Sheshi Kham? > > Regards, > Antony > > -- > Dr. Antony Green > Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31 > WE 1703 > 10369 Berlin, Germany > E-Mail: [email protected] > Mobile: +49-176-82295920 > > > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
