Hoi,
There is no point of having a project in the incubator that will not be
published as a Wikipedia because it is highly unlikely that we will get
consensus or a qualified majority for such a thing. It is not honest nor
fair to raise expectations that we will not fulfil.
Thanks,
     GerardM

On 18 May 2017 at 19:25, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote:

> Please let me restate a couple of key points about my suggestion that
> people seem not to have picked up:
>
>
>
>    - I have not proposed this as a substitute for a community's trying to
>    get its code changed. This is intended to be a workaround in the event that
>    is not possible.
>    - *I explicitly stated that the requirement remain that an ISO 639–3
>    code exists.  If a language has no ISO 639–3 code, it does not get an
>    Incubator test, and it does not get a subdomain project. Period.*
>       - I am quite sensitive to the fact that we don't want to make
>       independent judgments as to what is or is not a language. So no code, no
>       test. That does not change.
>    - This is *only* intended for cases where the community itself has a
>    code already, but finds its code offensive. It's up to LangCom to decide
>    whether the request is legitimate or frivolous.  I would assume that
>    LangCom would take a pretty narrow view of this, requiring there to be some
>    well-established history behind the request. I wouldn't presume to tell you
>    what that has to look like, but perhaps at minimum there has to have been a
>    request to SIL to change the code first, even if that request was denied.
>    - Based on the rules above, I see no possibility of a sustained flood
>    of applications from groups that lack a language code.  If there is briefly
>    such a flood, it will become clear quickly that such applications will be
>    summarily denied, and that will take care of that.
>       - If there are more requests from groups whose existing codes are
>       based on exonyms that would *prefer* a change—but the request goes
>       no farther than a preference–just say no.
>
>
> Thank you for listening.
> Steven
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to