Guys.

Being a ordinary wikipedian, I would like to let you guys know about my
idea. I support the changing of language code this time.

First of all, let's talk about the reason of why we should change the lang
code. I think that we should try to think about others. Currently, it is a
fact that the "arn" community doesn't like the lang code since they find it
offensive. I hope that everyone of you agree on that. At least we have
something that we all agree on.

Secondly, about the tech issues. It seems fine using Steven's plan to
create redirect links. So I don't see any tech issues making the change
impossible.

Finally, let's talk about some concerns you guys raised. About flooded
requests using invalid lang codes. I don't think that it would happen. By
making it clear to the public that the lang com made the chabge only
because the community found the code offensive, I don't think that there
will be lots of other requests like this.

I would like to say that. To make this discussion a better one, we should
be talking about reasons of why you support or oppose the change. Please
stop just saying that "oh I'm dead against it" or "oh it's racism". We need
reasons, and possibly examples to support your point.

Yours sincerely,

Gabriel

I am sorry for my bad English. I apologise if my word made you feel
offended, I was just trying to bring the discussion on the track.


On Fri, 19 May 2017, 03:40 Michael Everson, <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 18 May 2017, at 17:31, MF-Warburg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > We could make it clear - if we choose this option - that this is an
> exception for a language which already has a valid standard code.
>
> Set floodgates to “open”.
>
> Michael Everson
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to