No, I can only see it in the multilingual Wikisource, with only 20 pages.

I'm not sure that will they have much in the public domain area, given that
the language was only standardized in the 1920s, but Cyrillic versions of
older Persian works as they are studied in Tajikistan are legitimate.

In any case, yes, it's uncontroversially eligible.

בתאריך 27 במאי 2017 19:23,‏ "Gerard Meijssen" <[email protected]>
כתב:

> Hoi,
> It is because there is already a Tajik Wikisource.
> Thanks,
>      GerardM
>
> On 27 May 2017 at 18:18, Antony Green <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm marking Tajik Wikisource [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wi
>> ki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Tajik] eligible as well; it
>> seems uncontroversial to me.
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Antony Green
>> Rudolf-Seiffert-Str. 31
>> WE 1703
>> 10369 Berlin, Germany
>> E-Mail: [email protected]
>> Mobile: +49-176-82295920
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Langcom mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to