Please give a link… Even without seeing the discussion, there’s no reason to close be-tarask. It has 61K articles, and is a well-accepted orthography.
> On 16 Oct 2017, at 18:54, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote: > > This request is also generating a lot of heat, and not necessarily a lot of > light. > > For what it's worth, here's how I evaluate the arguments that have been made > here: > • Members of the be-tarask community strongly oppose (as you might > expect) > • Among replies (at Meta and on bewiki) from the bewiki community, > there seem to be none to really favor the proposal as written. Either they > oppose closure, or else they favor closure because they think the > Taraskievica orthography should be suppressed. > • The proposer has a grand total of 1 (one) edit on be-tarask, and 0 > (no) edits on bewiki. He is mostly flitting around Meta and Incubator > inserting opinions about projects he thinks should and should not continue to > exist. > > As far as I can tell, the bewiki and be-tarask communities seem to coexist > side-by-side well enough. So in the short term, I'd encourage you to reject > this proposal. If you think in the long run that these wikis should be > merged, then tackle that later. And I think the Nahuatl situation needs > attention more immediately than this does. > > Steven White (User:StevenJ81) > > Sent from Outlook > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
