Of the cases requesting follow-up, I'm aware of the following:
1. request for closure of be-tarask is to be rejected (i.e. be-tarask
should continue).
2. request for closure of Nahuatl is to be rejected (further steps are
still discussed but LangCom seems to have consensus not to close
Nahuatl).
3. Gorontalo wikipedia needs verification; I'm not aware of anyone
knowing a language expert to do that.
4. Lingua Franca Nova wikipedia is controversial indeed; I don't see
that LangCom has a consensus on this, so the approval seems to be at
least delayed.
Ad 1 and 2, the action of request rejection should be taken after 7 days
(unless other LangCom members object, i.e. support and argue for closure
of one and/or the other).
Ad 3 and 4, we're open to further suggestions but at this stage,
progress has stagnated :(
Fwiw,
Oliver
On 27-Oct-17 20:52, James Heilman wrote:
An editor is requesting follow up.
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Doc_James#Links_we_discussed
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
