Hoi,
The elegibility of a project is a pure technical assessment. When a project
exists in a language typically a new project with the same language code is
elegible. The exception is for macro codes and the codes where the language
content is not what the ISO-639-3 code represents.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 5 December 2017 at 15:53, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here are three more open RFL requests for non-Wikipedia projects dating to
> 2010:
> * Romanian Wikiversity (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_
> languages/Wikiversity_Romanian_2): Marked as "eligible"
> * Albanian Wikiversity (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_
> languages/Wikiversity_Albanian): Marked as "on hold", only because there
> is no Albanian content at all in Beta Wikiversity. If someone starts
> creating content, I will switch it to "eligible".
> * Khowar Wikinews (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_
> languages/Wikinews_Khowar): In principle, this should be "eligible". But
> after the fiasco with Wikipedia Khowar last March, MF-W reset the status on
> that to "open" instead of "eligible". I wasn't sure if that was intentional
> or an oversight. But notwithstanding that fiasco, there is no reason that
> either project shouldn't be "eligible". So I intend to mark both projects
> as "eligible". However, I'll hold off on these two for a few days to give
> MF-W (and anyone else) a chance to respond.
>
> Steven
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
