Yay, finally. Thank you so much for doing this. It took years! בתאריך 31 בדצמ׳ 2017 17:26, "MF-Warburg" <[email protected]> כתב:
> Good news at the end of the year: From Nurdin Kodzoev, the head of the > history department of the 'Ingush Research Institute of Humanities' > http://ingnii.ru/ I got the following confirmation: > > “We reviewed the texts from this project and confirmed that they were > written in the correct literary Ingush language. > They uses the current rules of grammar of the Ingush language. > I express my gratitude to Language Committee, and I hope that this section > of Wikipedia in the Ingush language will be approved.“ > > Do we need a proposal for approval, or did we already have it? > > Am 27.12.2017 12:40 vorm. schrieb "MF-Warburg" <[email protected]>: > >> I really don't want to approve a project where really nobody could be >> found to verify the content, in order to prevent some new Siberian >> Wikipedia case. So far we always found someone. >> >> That said, funnily <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wi >> ki/Language_proposal_policy#Final_approval> says "If all requirements >> have been met and a detailed investigation finds no unresolved problems", >> but does not explicitly mention the expert verification which we do as part >> of the "detailed investigation". So it's already possible to do this in a >> different way if we really really want to in a justified case. >> >> >> 2017-12-15 16:14 GMT+01:00 Steven White <[email protected]>: >> >>> In a way, Oliver, that just emphasizes my point. Everyone on this >>> Committee is a volunteer, every bit as much as the contributors to the new >>> projects. I don't think anyone can expect volunteers here to make >>> themselves crazy with work, either. On the other hand, at a certain point, >>> contributors to test projects are entitled to some resolution from us. And >>> if they've been working hard, doing legitimate work, that resolution should >>> be favorable, and shouldn't depend on our ability or inability to get a >>> response from language experts. >>> >>> >>> I'm inclined to propose a new rule. Following is a draft, not a request >>> for a vote, just to lay some ideas on the table for everyone: >>> >>> >>> RULE (DRAFT). To Handbook (committee), Final Approval, item #2 >>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_committee/Handbook_(committee)#Final_approval>, >>> add the following: >>> >>> >>> 4. If experts have been contacted (per item 1. above) but do not >>> respond, the test wiki community should be asked to provide the names of >>> two additional (different) language experts, and those should be contacted >>> as above. >>> >>> 5. If those experts also do not respond, and at least six months have >>> passed since the first request for language verification, the following >>> procedure applies: >>> >>> 5.1. LangCom makes a determination whether it thinks the test project >>> content is presumed legitimate. This is to be based, subjectively, on the >>> length of time the test has been open, the size of the test, and the number >>> of different contributors that have participated over time. >>> >>> 5.2. If LangCom believes the test project content is legitimate, a vote >>> can be called. The project can be approved if 2/3 of all members voting, >>> with at least five positive votes, agree. >>> >>> 5.3. Otherwise (or if the vote does not succeed), the test community is >>> told that language verification has failed, and that they need to continue >>> working on the test project for another six months, at which time another >>> attempt will be made for language verification. >>> >>> >>> Again, these are just ideas for now. >>> >>> Steven >>> >>> >>> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
