Hoi,
Please do not conflate issues.
For Serbian among others we have a system where the Latin script and the
Cyrillic script are transcribed automatically. When the additional
characters are used in a predictable way, it could be that these
differences are automated as well.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 9 January 2018 at 04:58, Phake Nick <[email protected]> wrote:
> How can one prove that the language is sufficiently different that reader
> cannot use the other wiki? There were already some lingulistic evidence
> being sent onto the mailing list previously but seems like that is not
> considered enough to prove sufficient uniqueness?
>
> If I understand correctly, when tried hard enough, a Portuguese reader can
> also understand Spanish wiki, does that mean Spanish wiki is enough and
> there'd be no need for Portuguese wiki?
>
> 2018年1月9日 08:52 於 "Michael Everson" <[email protected]> 寫道：
> >
> > […]
> >
> > The Montenegrins can PROVE to us that their Wikipedia will be different
> from the Serbian one by demonstrating how it differs and showing that their
> readers cannot use the Serbian Wiki.
> >
> > They have to at least TRY. This is not like Belarusian. This is not like
> English, even,
> >
> > Michael Everson
> > _______________________________________________
> > Langcom mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
