2018年1月25日 03:49 於 "MF-Warburg" <mfwarb...@googlemail.com> 寫道:
>
> Well, but it's equally true (and written) that "If there is no valid ISO
639 code, you must obtain one. The Wikimedia Foundation does not seek to
develop new linguistic entities".

My understanding on the description of "does not seek to develop new
linguistic entities" is that WMF does not seek to develop new language and
thus it would like confirmation from ISO standard regulation body, instead
of the code itself.

> We do absolutely not want to invent our own codes, because that gets
really messy, especially when at some point a language does get a real code.

Why not tentatively use e.g. ISO639-6 code as a working code in incubator
or for the project before it could get a 639-1/2/3 code? after it get a
code in ISO 639-1/2/3 then it should be possible to move things over.
Although all the code change requests have been piled up for years in
phabricator but that should hopefully be sorted out one day.
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to