Hoi,
For me when a language code is abused, it follows that no follow up
projects are in order so I would reject when there is no clarification of
what it should be.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 15 May 2018 at 00:22, Steven White <koala19...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Wikiversity Sinhala
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Sinhala>:
> No content was ever created. Rejecting as stale.
>
> Wikiversity Tamil
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Tamil>:
> The requester hasn't been active on meta since 2013, but is occasionally
> active at Tamil Wikipedia. I will ask if he plans to do anything with this.
> There was one page (effectively, a main page) created two years earlier
> than this request, but nothing has been done since. Unless creator tells me
> otherwise, I intend to reject as stale.
>
> Wikiversity Zazaki
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikiversity_Zazaki>
> (diq):
> I suppose it's a fair question to ask why diq is able to co-opt the name
> Zazaki, which more correctly applies to the macrolanguage as a whole (at
> least according to ISO 639-3). The Wikipedia in this language calls itself
> Zazaki (or Zaza), too. ISO, on the other hand, uses "Dimli" for langcode
> diq. Still, there are 94 pages in this test, so it is eligible. You can
> tell me at a future date if you want to try to change the working name the
> projects use.
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
