Hoi,
As always, eligible means that when people put in the effort and it is
proven to be that language it will be approved. Stale imho only means that
a past attempt was not succesful so that we do not have to continually
monitor it. Eligibility is not affected by staleness.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 19 June 2018 at 23:14, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi. Please see this comment
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Some_old_requests_that_don't_have_Incubator_tests_but_also_%E2%80%9Celigible%E2%80%9D>
> on Meta.
>
>
> Contributors pointed out three cases in which a request was marked
> "eligible" (usually long ago), but where a test project was never started.
> Question I have for you is: Should I leave them alone, or change them to
> "rejected as stale"?
>
>
> I can go either way on this. If we were evaluating them now, we'd close
> them as stale. But my big concern in trying to process all of these
> requests is to try to clear the backlog of "discussion" and "on hold"
> requests, because those make us appear as if we're not doing anything.
> There are many old requests with the status of "eligible" because people
> work on them only sporadically. In a sense, these are no different.
>
>
> I'd appreciate some opinions on this.
>
> Steven
>
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
