Revived Cornish has had a century of publication. I in fact have published well over two million words in Cornish. I’ve never looked into Revived Prussian, but it should be easy to determine whether it’s robust enough for use.
> On 16 Jul 2018, at 19:39, Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On the other hand,, the Langcom accepted Lingua Franca Nova, which has no > native speakers either. Yet, the project is doing very well: almost 1,400 new > articles since it was created, less than three months ago. > > Of course, Modern Prussian is a semi-constructed language. But then, the same > goes for Cornish. Who are we to decide whether a language is viable or not? > Personally, I'd mark it eligible. If they can make the test wiki work (I > mean: really really work), then I see no counter-indication for a Prussian > Wikipedia either. > > For the record, I've never understood why there cannot be a Wikipedia in > Ancient Greek, since there are millions of people worldwide who can write in > it. > > Best regards, > Jan van Steenbergen _______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list Langcom@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
