Hoi,
The language committee is not tasked with indicating the projects that are
dormant.
If anything it is our task to help those projects to gain new activities.
When Wikidata is used to bring information in templates and in information
in a similar way to the Cebuano Wikipedia (but more integrated in the
overall process you get the perspective as painted in the Celtic Knot
conference and the perspective that has my support.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 29 July 2018 at 11:29, Yongmin H. <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please inform Stewards' Noticeboard (and possibly CVN people), at least.
> This sounds like a lot more work for us.
>
> Just a side note: I sometimes think langcom is just creating more work for
> stewards and SWMT members without taking a look at the inactive projects
> that can be closed, but I don't have an example to show you. (So treat it
> as such)
>
> --
> Yongmin
> Sent from my iPhone
> https://reviwiki.info/
> Text licensed under CC BY ND 2.0 KR
> Please note that this address is list-only address and any non-mailing
> list mails will be treated as spam.
> Please use https://encrypt.to/0x947f156f16250de39788c3c35b625da5beff197a
>
> 2018. 7. 28. 00:29, Steven White <[email protected]> 작성:
>
> I don't know if the community discussion should be on Incubator (and
> advertised at Meta [and Beta]), on Meta (and advertised on Incubator [and
> Beta]), or if there should be two. And when do we start it? Thoughts?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
