I agree with Gerard – oppose both. fre. 27. sep. 2019 kl. 13:09 skrev Gerard Meijssen < [email protected]>:
> Hoi, > For me both projects have no future. Particularly the Old English project > is to be rejected with prejudice. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 15:47, Steven White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> MF-W, do you still want to support the request for a Wikinews in >> Literary Chinese >> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikinews_Literary_Chinese>? >> As mentioned previously, because Literary Chinese is considered a >> historical language, this project is technically against policy. (This also >> means we would need 2/3 in favor, if there is not consensus.) >> >> Similar question to all: a request just came in for a Wikinews in Old >> English >> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikinews_Old_English>. >> Can I just reject? >> >> Let me point out: Wikinews projects are difficult even under ideal >> circumstances. I doubt either of these would prove to be ideal >> circumstances. >> Steven >> >> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook> >> _______________________________________________ >> Langcom mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom >> > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom > -- mvh Jon Harald Søby
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
