Please see 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Prussian_2.

Prussian was considered to have gone extinct in the 18th century, and for a 
while was listed in ISO 639-3 as "extinct". Indeed, that was the situation when 
the project was first proposed in 2007.  However, in 2009, its listing in ISO 
was changed from "extinct" to "living", due to a robust effort to revive the 
language. Indeed, the Wikipedia 
article<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Prussian_language#Revived_Old_Prussian>
 suggests that there are now a few children who are natively bilingual.

The revival effort is not based on this Wikipedia. The test project has been 
moderately active over the years, but certainly not at a level that would start 
us contemplating approval. But to me this is further evidence that the revival 
is real and legitimate on its own, and not the very reason for a Prussian 
Wikipedia project.

One person commenting on the request page suggests that prg should not be the 
language code for the revival. Still, the fact that the ISO listing was changed 
to "living" suggests that at least for now, the standards authority is willing 
to accept that, so we should be, too.

Accordingly, I recommend that this project be marked "eligible".

Steven


Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to