It makes sense to be as encouraging as possible, so I'd go with Option #1.
After all, automatic conversion should be fairly easy.

Steven White <[email protected]>, 20 Kas 2019 Çar, 15:40 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:

> Does anyone have *any* thoughts on this?
> Steven
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Steven White
> *Sent:* Friday, November 8, 2019 10:53 AM
> *To:* WMF LangCom (public) <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Khorasani Turkic
>
> See
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Khorasani_Turkic
> .
>
> In theory, this request should be eligible. And while the test project has
> been mostly dormant over the last seven years, it objectively has been
> active enough not to reject as "stale". However, the project is entirely
> written in Latin script, which Ethnologue does not indicate is a valid
> script for the language. Over a year ago, I put the request on hold,
> pending conversion of the contents to Perso-Arabic, but no action has been
> taken. So which of the three actions below does the committee think I
> should take here?
>
>    1. Mark "eligible", but note on the request page that the project will
>    under no conditions merit final approval unless written in Perso-Arabic.
>    2. Mark "rejected", inviting the community to reapply when the test is
>    converted to Perso-Arabic.
>    3. Leave as "on hold" indefinitely, awaiting conversion to
>    Perso-Arabic.
>
> Personally, I favor #1, but mainly because I don't like keeping projects
> on indefinite hold, as I think that makes us look indecisive and pokey. But
> I could live with #3 in this particular case.
>
> Thoughts?
> Steven
>
> Sent from Outlook <http://aka.ms/weboutlook>
> _______________________________________________
> Langcom mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
>
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom

Reply via email to