Another mail was sent to this mailing list this morning, by Mehdi Moshkriz. I am not letting it through moderation (though if members want to read it, I will forward it), as the gist of its argument is that we should not listen to Amir S., for he is neither a native speaker of Luri, nor a linguist, and therefore it is no wonder that he doesn't understand Luri. Please stop with this attempt at derailing the discussion and address the real point that he raised, which is: that real Luri speakers he contacted do not identify the content of Northern Luri Wikipedia as Northern Luri.
Am Di., 20. Okt. 2020 um 22:37 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < [email protected]>: > Am So., 18. Okt. 2020 um 17:53 Uhr schrieb Mohammad Mogoei < > [email protected]>: > >> Dear members of committee >> >> We've answered all questions that Amir asked by firm documents and >> references. But now we see Amir is trying to change the topic into renaming >> the lrc.wikipedia.com to lki.wikipedia.com! It's clear that this claim >> is absolutely wrong because Luri is different from Laki and these two are >> not the same. At the end, we expect you reject Amir's proposal about Luri >> Wikipedia according to our clear answers and references. >> > > Well, no. Amir is not "trying to change the topic into renaming > lrc.wikipedia.com to lki.wikipedia.com". Please address the actual > questions that were raised about the content and the identification of the > language. It is not sufficient to say "we gave clear answers and > references" when all you say is ... > > >> Considering that Amir Sarabadani's mother tongue is not Luri and Laki is >> different from Northen Luri and the difference between the two is quite >> clear and that he is not able to write and read in Northen Luri so he is >> not able to make the claim they mentioned in their email. , And there is no >> need to move or do anything else. >> > > ...that Amir's points are invalid because he is not lrc-N / lki-N / > whatever language this really is - N. > > >> Luri Wikipedia has been the result of the efforts of young people who >> have no formal or informal educational media to write in Luri in Iran for >> almost ten years from the time it was created until today, and these young >> people want to continue working and writing in Luri. >> > > Previously your claim was that Luri Wikipedia is written and / or backed > by some brilliant "linguists and professors", who produced "calligraphy > training books", now it's only some poor students who are barely literate? > Come on. > > >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/langcom
