Hallo, I marked a few Wiktionary requests as eligible. All of them are in languages in which there already is at least a Wikipedia, so it shouldn't be controversial:
1. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Bhojpuri 2. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Cantonese 3. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Cebuano 4. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Ilokano 5. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kazakh 6. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Kapampangan 7. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Tulu 8. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Waray If anyone disagrees, please revert me :) A mostly-technical comment about Bhojpuri: To the best of my understanding, the Bhojpuri *Wikipedia* is at https://bh.wikipedia.org . The code bh is deprecated and when it was in the standard, it referred to "Bihari languages", so the Wikipedia's URL is a historical, technical mistake, that will hopefully be fixed Some Day. The Wikisource request is for code "bho", which is valid. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
