Hallo!

I am going through
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Open_requests_for_new_languages ,
project by project, letter by letter, up to ten requests per email, one
email per day.

I am now working on Wikipedia, and today I'm handling the letter I.
Incidentally or not, the English names of all the languages here begin with
the prefix "Inter", so I'll paste the policy on artificial languages for
convenience:

=================================
If the proposal is for an artificial language such as Esperanto, it must
have a reasonable degree of recognition as determined by discussion. (Some
recognition criteria include, but are not limited to: independently proved
number of speakers, use as an auxiliary language outside of online
communities created solely for the purpose, usage outside of Wikimedia,
publication of works in the language for general sale.)
=================================

I'll also throw in one Wikibooks request to round up the letter I.

== Interglossa Wikipedia ==
Request:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Interglossa
Code: igs
My take: Not eligible. The request lists several examples of usage, but as
far as I can see, all of them are online communities created solely for the
purpose, which is explicitly mentioned as not enough for eligibility. Also,
some of them appear to be about Glosa, which is a related, but separate
auxiliary language project (which doesn't have an ISO 639 code).

== Interlingue Wikibooks ==
Request:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikibooks_Interlingue
Code: ie
My take: Eligible, though barely. Some books were published in it in the
past, so I guess it satisfies the "publication of works in the language for
general sale" condition.

== International Sign Wikipedia ==
Request:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_International_Sign
Code: ils
My take: Delete, unless the request creator responds to my questions at
https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sdf&oldid=27587988#Request_for_new_languages
. The language is theoretically eligible, but with absolutely no details in
the request page, it's unclear how will this project work, and it's as if
it hasn't been filed at all.

== Interslavic Wikipedia ==
Request:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Interslavic
Code: isv
My take: Eligible, though also barely. According to the policy, the online
communities dedicated to it are not enough by themselves, but I do have to
admit that they are surprisingly lively. (And although I can't emphasize
strongly enough that this is _*NOT*_ a consideration for or against
eligibility, I will say that because I know Russian, I can understand
everything that is written in them.) In a previous email on the topic, I
noted that I haven't seen evidence that there is published content in this
language, but now I see that this language has been used in films, music,
and books that seem to be independent of the original creator, so I guess
it satisfies the "publication of works in the language for general sale"
condition. I do have to express doubt that a Wikipedia in this language
will be sustainable in the long term, but I cannot find any procedural
reason to mark the request as ineligible.

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬
_______________________________________________
Langcom mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to