The agency that assigns ISO codes already has a standardized terminology, which is '*constructed language.'. *I suggest going with what already exists to avoid miscommunication in the future.
--- Tochi Precious *Wikipedian in Residence at Moleskine Foundation* *German/English, Igbo/English, French/English Translator| Editor|* *Alumnus, Cherie Blair Foundation Mentorship Program* *Zimba Women Mentor, Uganda* *Ambassador, The Next Economy Nigeria* *Alles ist möglich* On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 4:34 PM MF-Warburg <mfwarb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_proposal_policy as user > suggested to use the term "constructed language" rather than "artificial > language" in the policy. Seems decent enough to me. Any other thoughts? > _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
