I tend to think: it's still the same, so it still shouldn't be closed - namely, a very low level activity but it exists and the wiki seems to be somewhat actively monitored.
Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2025 um 12:44 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki < sotiale...@gmail.com>: > I would like to reevaluate this at this point. > It has been about 4 months since the previous point. If it is still the > same, it would be better to close this project. > > Sotiale > > 2024년 10월 7일 (월) 오후 2:57, Sotiale Wiki <sotiale...@gmail.com>님이 작성: > >> I agree with you. This is different from pihwiki, where I previously >> supported closure. >> There is currently no active reason to close this project, and no >> evidence that consensus has been reached. >> >> Sotiale >> >> 2024년 10월 7일 (월) 오전 1:25, MF-Warburg <mfwarb...@googlemail.com>님이 작성: >> >>> >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Lak_Wikipedia_3 >>> >>> Previously I proposed approving the closure and obtained the Board's >>> non-veto in April 2023. For better or worse, the closure was not >>> implemented. Now the project is not inactive, so the proposal should be >>> rejected. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >>> >> _______________________________________________ > Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-le...@lists.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
