On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 00:34 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 00:21 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > Of course, all of the above will be tested as part of our test suites. > > > > Which of these can not wait for 2.11/12? > > Well, *technically* they could all wait for the next cycle. But it > would be really tragic if our users weren't able to use those methods > for half a year just because we were blind or the lacked the time to > implement them. > > > These additions will not disturb existing applications, but I worry > > that you don't have time to check that the API is correct before it's > > really frozen. > > I think that's unfounded because we have tests (included in the patches) > for every change that ensure that they all do exactly what they're > supposed to do.
You can never be sure that you've tested everything, but that's far more than I expected, so here's 1 of 2 approvals. Thanks for being careful. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ language-bindings mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/language-bindings
