On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:39:26PM -0700, Paul Prescod wrote: > If one presumes that Parrot is going to be so much nicer than the > current Perl internals that many more people will be interested in it, > then maybe it makes sense to make names as readable as possible, even if > they are not what Perl historically used. > > I propose, for example, "intval" for IV and "floatval" for NV. Eeeeuw! That is merely a matter of vocabulary, and if people can cope with such terse 'words' as cp, ln, sed, etc then they can cope with IV and NV. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david Some people, when confronted with a problem, think ``I know, I'll use regular expressions.'' Now they have two problems. -- jwz
- Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Jason Watkins
- RE: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Brent Dax
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Sterling Hughes
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Paul Prescod
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Stephane Payrard
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? David Cantrell
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? boris
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Guido van Rossum
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Donal K. Fellows
- Re: Anachronistic Acronyms in Parrot? Simon Cozens
